ITIL ®V3 (IT Service Management)
PRINCE2 ® (Projects in Controlled Environments)
PRINCE2 ® (Projects in Controlled Environments)
Agile Management Innovations
Wirtschaftsinformatik - Diplom-Ingenieur
Informatikmanagement - Mag. rer. soc. oec
Wirtschaftsinformatik - Bakk.rer. soc. oec
Social Science - DEUG
We need to observe around to come to the conclusion that we are lacking of the right delivery process and not of practical knowledge for development.
The objective of this paper is to respond to the angoisse -
at the end of the day, we can say we provided practical knowledge, we achieved results, however no one is happy and the solution becomes unsustainable - A situation that makes development delivery complex and unconfortable.
"Long
waiting times and endless queues are the norm for people collecting cash. In
Gaza, the tension caused by the long wait sometimes descends into clashes in
the street. One 45-year-old widow from Rafah recounts: "I went to collect
my payment slip but there was a queue and it took me three hours to get it.
Staff were sitting in a comfortable office, and us women and the elderly had to
wait in the sun."
Poor
targeting of cash transfers can be a problem and is seen as particularly unjust
where people who are less poor benefit while extremely poor people remain on
waiting lists or are unaware of their eligibility. In Kenya, many people living
in poverty couldn't understand why they weren't receiving any money while
others were. In this case, people hadn't realised that they have to apply to be
enrolled on the programme.
In Uganda,
elderly people receiving cash often find it difficult to make a complaint when
mistakes happen. Sometimes this is due to technology problems or administrative
delays, but often people are reluctant to complain because they fear their
benefits will be taken away. One elderly man said those implementing the
programme see people who complain as troublemakers" (Source: The Guardian).
We are not
lacking of the practical knowledge for development. We are certainly facing the
challenge to well design, produce, package, move, deliver and to support foreign practical knowledge for development into
community practices (Practical Client Knowledge) for enhancing efficient investments in education, health, public administration, infrastructure, financial and private sector development, agriculture and environmental and natural resource management etc. and particularly local community
development outcomes.
"* Example: in the early 20th century the
American Red Cross - I believe led mostly by volunteers sort of invented Public
Health outreach. In their context it was new, novel, innovative, and yet
perhaps a bit messy and inefficient; yet people needed and appreciate this new
practical knowledge and eventually local, state and national government adopted
Public Health outreach and added it to standardized government services more within
your two definitions.
* The challenge - how do we "Listen" carefully to the Practical client knowledge to discover what's working, to better understand the local context, then adapt or blend in your two types of practical knowledge to see, if combined with practical client knowledge we come up with even better local results.
* The mode issue - Otherwise, at the end of the day, we can say we provided practical knowledge, we achieved results, however no one is happy and the solution becomes unsustainable" (Bruce Summers, CVA, linkedin).
* The challenge - how do we "Listen" carefully to the Practical client knowledge to discover what's working, to better understand the local context, then adapt or blend in your two types of practical knowledge to see, if combined with practical client knowledge we come up with even better local results.
* The mode issue - Otherwise, at the end of the day, we can say we provided practical knowledge, we achieved results, however no one is happy and the solution becomes unsustainable" (Bruce Summers, CVA, linkedin).
The
practical Knowledge for Development is crucial to achieving the Mission of
ending world poverty. This knowledge solves poorest people’s
problems. Knowledge that is designed, tested, packaged and embedded in
development interventions.
Oft focused on the development of the
capacities of the local communities in helping the communities to drive and to
promote their own sustainable development processes through suitable evaluation
processes, through the right adequate local sociocultural knowledge
infrastructures, through effective collaborative and participatory approaches
with governments, private sector, PPPs, NGOs etc. with the respect of the local
Knowledge resources and potentials, at the right place and at the right moment.
A successful practical Knowledge for
Development should be carefully targeted towards its audience, with the right
mixture of delivery, support, simplicity, elegance, and, with the right
sustainable communities’ development innovations through the right knowledge
formats and the right sociocultural knowledge infrastructures.
“the best Knowledge Management, learning and
evaluation strategies in the UK are not necessarily the best Knowledge
Management, learning and evaluation strategies in Uganda. Different groups and
organizations (whether they are different due to political circumstances,
economic resources, culture, social background or religion etc.) may have
different associations in relation to concepts such as ‘leadership’,
‘cooperation’, ‘information’, ‘sharing’ and ‘monitoring” (Hovland 2003: 8).
The "Science of Delivery" is the right mechanism to design, to produce, to package, to move, to deliver and to support successfully external and internal practical knowledge for development into community practices (Practical Client Knowledge) for enhancing local community development outcomes.
Understanding and listening to by knowledge producers, governments and donors etc. could help to well design, to produce, to package, to deliver and to support with elegance and simplicity a practical knowledge package for development into a foreign community practices.
One of the reasons I’m so passionate about
local poor communities information in the design, alignment and production of a practical knowledge package
for development is because I find it to be the best way in development arena to
help poorest people, to find something that could better works. And we’re not going to
help poorest people unless we listen to them and evaluate what their important
issues are.
It is sometime regretable to see that we do
not really listen to poorest people to understand what they primary need,
what they want, what issues are most important to them. Certainly they have primary needs that we should always deliver first or we should rethink how to delivery
it better.
But listening to poor communities isn’t just about
talking to our sources or even talking to People's Government at meetings. The poor people
who we are serving have to earn our trust, but at the same time we always need
to check out what they need and what they are saying.
Listening to poor communities for finding what works in the basis for evidence before intervention is meaning we need to be in the communities, go to the people wherever they are living, talking to them. Go where those poorest people are. Let them know where we are, to understand, and evaluating their needs.
The challenge is what to do? What we
need to listen for and why? Responding to the following questions could help to
understand what to do, and why we need to listen for poor people :
How people do we suppose to help view our engagement? Is it positive or negative?
What are they saying about our current program, project or service?
What do they think about our program, project and service area?
What do they like or dislike about our program, project or service?
How are their preferences changing?
Do they take our services seriously?
Do they respect our engagements and our requirements?
Do they meet our requirements?
How are our technologies and social trends impacting our targeted community practices?
What ideas might they offer for better services delivery?
How is the conversation, listening and understanding around our organization, issue area, program, service, delivery model, changing?
Why poorest local governments are so corrupted?
Why are poorest voiceless and powerless?
......
One elegance of the science of delivery is to listen to the targeted community, and act on that feedback.
Anything we do in a community requires us to be familiar
with its people, its issues, and its history. Carrying out an intervention
or building a coalition is far more likely to be successful if we are
informed by the culture of the community and having an understanding of the
relationships among individuals and groups within it. This will meet requirements
of both functionality and elegance.
We need to adopt a posture of listening to community and understanding their practices in which we want to deliver service. And it is one of the most important missions of the science delivery.
We need to adopt a posture of listening to community and understanding their practices in which we want to deliver service. And it is one of the most important missions of the science delivery.
But what would be different if we moved closely into
intimate relationship with a community and we adopte a posture where we were
listening –Delivery listening – wanting to know what it is that poor people
want or need or in what ways we can deliver the service with success,
simplicity and elegance into the community practices?
Community practices vary from region to region, from sector to sector, change with the time and in the space. Transplanting what we did somewhere else and bring it into community practices whether poor people understand this or not, will not always work. We need to change while embracing a science of delivery to improve delivery outcome. "Otherwise, at the end of the day, we can say we provided practical knowledge, we achieved results, however no one is happy and the solution becomes unsustainable".
The success of the science of delivery will depend on how well a delivered intervention is designed, on how well a delivered intervention is targeted, on how well a delivered intervention is articulated, on how well all the stakeholders are integrated and interested in the processes of the delivery (Why operate agile in sustainable development programmes and projects?).
Simple copy and paste or the simple transfer of a successfully delivery in another region or in another sector could not work. The success requires an innovative adaptation of the transferred, copied and pasted delivery ......
Anyway, the *Science of Delivery* addresses more precisely an innovative development intervention (project and program) that includes: inclusion management in all phases of the intervention, the availability of the right sociocultural infrastructures that enable the development and the support of the intervention on the target site, the knowledge transfer mechanisms and change management that enable efficient management and the exploitation of the delivered intervention on the target site after the intervention exits.
Fig. Framework to improve development interventions
Another challenge is even government level was unable to
guide and coordinate actions at local level since they lacked proper
information and access to area, while the local level was doing their
best but had no proper platforms for coordinated action. It is very
important to realize that we need better coordination, listening, understanding, and right information to help
control the delivery of practical knowledge into regional,
national, local context, and particularly into community practices.
The following figure describes a good way (Top-down
und Bottom-up) to accomplish that is to create a delivery structure and
description for knowledge management for development - a record of exploration and delivering hierarchies.
Fig. Delivery structure and description - Top-down und Bottom-up approach
Central Department of the Knowledge for
Development
Collaborates
with public and private organizations, universities, government, knowledge
researchers, knowledge centre for developments, volunteers, civil organizations,
NGOs to research development knowledge, to identify suitable development products, etc. in each development sector
Designs
the knowledge architecture in different formatsProduces the development knowledge in different formats
Testing and package the knowledge in different formats to a target development solution
Diffuses and delivers the practical knowledge for development across various platforms, repositories and with different formats into regional knowledge centre through different delivery channels
Manages change at the central niveau
Initiates assessment and evaluation to determine high practical knowledge level impact through various testing processes
Determines changes required within practical knowledge architectures, formats and platforms to ensure they are functioning appropriately within community practices
Releases updated knowledge formats to resolve validated incompatibilities
Incorporates necessary changes in future new practical knowledge products
Regional Centre
Collaborates
with regional public and private organizations, universities, governments,
knowledge researchers, knowledge centre for development, volunteers, civil
organizations, NGOs for translating the delivered practical knowledge for
development into the regional development context with the right formats across
various platforms
Delivers
the translated practical knowledge for development into the national development
context with the right different formatsWorks, reports to and communicates with the Central Department with regards to delivery and format issues
Provides support and upgrade to the delivered practical knowledge for development
Works with other regional centres to share and resolve knowledge delivery, format, platform, support issues
Manages change and risk at the regional niveau
Initiates assessment and evaluation to determine high practical knowledge level impact through various testing processes
Determines changes required within practical knowledge architectures, formats and platforms to ensure they are functioning appropriately within community practices
Releases updated knowledge formats to resolve validated incompatibilities
Incorporates necessary changes in future new practical knowledge products
National Centre
Collaborates
with national public and private organizations, universities, governments,
knowledge researchers, knowledge centre for development, volunteers, civil
organizations, NGOs to choose the right translated practical knowledge for
development that corresponds to the national development context with the right
formats
Diffuses
the selected practical knowledge for development across various platforms in
different formatsworks with national centre to share and resolve knowledge delivery, format, platform, support issues
Provides support and upgrade to the selected practical knowledge for development
Work, reports to and communicates with Regional Centre with regards to delivery and format issues
Works with other national centres to share and resolve knowledge delivery, format, platform, support issues
Manages change and risk at national niveau
Initiates assessment and evaluation to determine high practical knowledge level impact through various testing processes
Determines changes required within practical knowledge architectures, formats and platforms to ensure they are functioning appropriately within community practices
Releases updated knowledge formats to resolve validated incompatibilities
Incorporates necessary changes in future new practical knowledge products
Local Centre
Collaborates
with local public and private organizations, universities, governments,
knowledge researchers, knowledge centre for development, volunteers,
civil organizations, NGOs to choose and integrate the right translated
practical knowledge for development that corresponds to the local community
development context with the right formats
Works,
reports to and communicates with Regional Centre with regards to delivery and
format issuesProvides support and upgrade to the selected practical knowledge for development
Works with other local centres to share and resolve knowledge delivery, format, platform, support issues
Manages change and risk at the local niveau
Initiates assessment and evaluation to determine high practical knowledge level impact through various testing processes
Determines changes required within practical knowledge architectures, formats and platforms to ensure they are functioning appropriately within community practices
Releases updated knowledge formats to resolve validated incompatibilities
Incorporates necessary changes in future new practical knowledge products
A good way to accomplish that is to create a delivery structure and description - a record of exploration and delivering hierarchies.
It's a good way to
gain a comprehensive overview of the community practices, what it is now, what
it's been in the past, and what it could be in the future. It’s important to
understand community, what a community is, and the specific nature of the
community practices we work in and we want to deliver a specific service.
Understanding the community entails understanding it in a number of ways.
Getting a clear sense of what is happening there may be key to a full understanding of it. At the same time, it's important to understand the specific community practices we are concerned with. The practices endorsed by the geography, the culture, the history and others social and environmental factors.
We need to know
the people, their culture, their concerns to align the design and the delivery
processes of each practical knowledge package for development to their social
challenge. Otherwise our challenge will be vain as said it by Blaise Pascal - "Vérité en-deçà des Pyrénées, erreur au-delà" .
The following table describes some characteristic of
what we need to "know" for a better delivery.....
Physical aspects
|
Every community
has a physical presence of some sort, even if only one building. Most
have a geographic area or areas they are either defined by or attached to.
It's important to know the community's size and the look and feel of
its buildings, its topography (the lay of the land -- the hills, valleys,
rivers, roads, and other features you'd find on a map), and each of its
neighborhoods. Also important are how various areas of the community
differ from one another, and whether your impression is one of clean, well-maintained
houses and streets, or one of shabbiness, dirt, and neglect.
|
Infrastructure
|
Roads, bridges, transportation (local public transportation, airports,
and train lines), electricity, land line and mobile telephone service,
broadband service, and similar "basics" make up the infrastructure
of the community, without which it couldn't function.
|
Patterns of settlement, commerce, and industry
|
Where
are those physical spaces we've been discussing? Communities reveal their
character by where and how they create living and working spaces. Where there
are true slums -- substandard housing in areas with few or no services that
are the only options for low-income people -- the value the larger community
places on those residents seems clear. Are heavy industries located
next to residential neighborhoods? If so, who lives in those
neighborhoods? Are some parts of the community dangerous, either
because of high crime and violence or because of unsafe conditions in the
built or natural environment?
|
Demographics
|
It's
vital to understand who makes up the community. Age, gender, race and
ethnicity, marital status, education, number of people in household, first
language -- these and other statistics make up the demographic profile of the
population. When you put them together (e.g., the education level of
black women ages 18-24), it gives you a clear picture of who community
residents are.
|
History
|
The
long-term history of the community can tell you about community traditions,
what the community is, or has been, proud of, and what residents would prefer
not to talk about. Recent history can afford valuable information about
conflicts and factions within the community, important issues, past and
current relationships among key people and groups -- many of the factors that
can trip up any effort before it starts if you don't know about and address
them.
|
Community leaders, formal and informal
|
Some
community leaders are elected or appointed -- mayors, city councilors, and
directors of public works. Others are considered leaders because of
their activities or their positions in the community -- community activists,
corporate CEO's, college presidents, doctors, clergy. Still others are
recognized as leaders because, they are trusted for their proven integrity,
courage, and/or care for others and the good of the community.
|
Community culture, formal and informal
|
This
covers the spoken and unspoken rules and traditions by which the community
lives. It can include everything from community events and slogans --
the blessing of the fishing fleet, the "Artichoke Capital of the
World" -- to norms of behavior -- turning a blind eye to alcohol abuse
or domestic violence -- to patterns of discrimination and exercise of power.
Understanding the culture and how it developed can be crucial,
especially if that's what you're attempting to change.
|
Existing groups
|
Most
communities have an array of groups and organizations of different kinds --
service clubs (Lions, Rotary, etc.), faith groups, youth organizations,
sports teams and clubs, groups formed around shared interests, the boards of
community-wide organizations (the YMCA, the symphony, United Way), as well as
groups devoted to self-help, advocacy, and activism. Knowing of the
existence and importance of each of these groups can pave the way for
alliances or for understanding opposition.
|
Existing institutions
|
Every
community has institutions that are important to it, and that have more or
less credibility with residents. Colleges and universities, libraries,
religious institutions, hospitals -- all of these and many others can occupy
important places in the community. It's important to know what they
are, who represents them, and what influence they wield.
|
Economics
|
Who are
the major employers in the community? What, if any, business or
industry is the community's base? Who, if anyone, exercises economic
power? How is wealth distributed? Would you characterize the
community as poor, working, class, middle class, or affluent? What are
the economic prospects of the population in general and/or the population
you're concerned with?
|
Government/Politics
|
Understanding
the structure of community government is obviously important. Some
communities may have strong mayors and weak city councils, others the
opposite. Still other communities may have no mayor at all, but only a
town manager, or may have a different form of government entirely.
Whatever the government structure, where does political power lie?
Understanding where the real power is can be the difference between a
successful effort and a vain one.
|
Social structure
|
Many
aspects of social structure are integrated into other areas -- relationships,
politics, economics -- but there are also the questions of how people in the
community relate to one another on a daily basis, how problems are (or
aren't) resolved, who socializes or does business with whom, etc. This
area also includes perceptions and symbols of status and respect, and whether
status carries entitlement or responsibility (or both).
|
Attitudes and values
|
Again,
much of this area may be covered by investigation into others, particularly
culture. What does the community care about, and what does it ignore?
What are residents' assumptions about the proper way to behave, to
dress, to do business, to treat others? Is there widely accepted
discrimination against one or more groups by the majority or by those in
power? What are the norms for interaction among those who with
different opinions or different backgrounds?
|
Once we get the right pictures, and the comprehension of “what is happened on the targeted ground” we need now to think about the design, the format, and the delivery and support processes of the intervention into the community practices. The following questions could help us building the right delivery and Support into community practices.
How could we deliver
successfully our practical knowledge as knowledge package? How do we know our
knowledge package will work with success in the target audience´s environment
with regards to political, social, cultural and institutional realities on the
ground? Are we right to deliver, to support and to upgrade continuous the
knowledge package on the target site? Is there the complete local capacity in
terms of adequate sociocultural infrastructures, and the technical, managerial
and financial skills to bring and support such knowledge package to a
successful end? Are the tools and machinery required to carry on the knowledge
package available locally and are the resources required to maintain the above
also available locally? ...
We are trying to deliver,
and support successfully an extern practical public knowledge for development
into local practical client knowledge (community’s practices)...
Virtual platform will be
the best solution. Unfortunately, the information technology alone could
not resolve the challenge we are facing in the effective delivery of knowledge
for development services into a local community practices (Practical client
knowledge). The limit of access to the information technology in remote areas
even in some urban areas is a major obstacle in the effective delivery of
knowledge development services.
The approach integrates
people, systems (virtual and physical) and practices into a process that
collaboratively harnesses the talents of all participants to optimize
the delivery results, increase value to the delivered intervention, reduce waste, and
maximize efficiency through all phases of design, production, testing,
readapting, packaging, embedding, distributing, delivering, transferring,
replicating and supporting delivery into local Community
Practices.
The following table describes the key elements and what to do, to know,
processes etc. for the efficient designing, delivery and support of practical
knowledge for development into community practices.
The following table describes the key elements and what to do, what to know, processes etc. for the efficient designing, delivery and support of practical knowledge for development into community practices.
Key environment
|
What to do, what to know etc.
|
Knowing the practical client knowledge
environment
|
Local practices
Basis needs
learning experience
Spiritual, moral,
religion and philosophy
Daily practices
Habits
Economic, social and political
environment
|
Knowing the capacities of the client in
sociocultural knowledge infrastructures ( Access to and availability)
|
Transport infrastructures
water infrastructures,
communication infrastructures,
solid and liquid waste infrastructures
earth monitoring and measurement
infrastructures
management and governance of social
infrastructures
economic and cultural infrastructures,
economic infrastructures
social infrastructures,
cultural infrastructures,
environmental infrastructures
|
Discussing with the target
community
|
Cooperation
Collaboration
Participation
Friends
Stakeholder
Feedback
Listing
Involvement
|
Understanding the requirement
|
Situation
Scope
Environment
Knowledge business case
Obstacle
|
Building the practical knowledge
business case
|
Desirable
Viable
Achievable
Measurable
Utility (fit for purpose)
Warranty (fit for use)
Worth the continued updating
|
Work with target client
To identify:
|
Real life story
Community elders sharing
The right knowledge scope
The right knowledge format
The right knowledge infrastructures
The right knowledge sharing and transfer
strategy
The continuous knowledge upgrades
strategy and policies
|
Listen to the target Client
|
communication
Communities needs
Local or regional committee
Local government
Direct participation
Collaboration
Feedbacks.
Involvement
|
Evaluate the infrastructures of the
client
|
Local potential socio cultural knowledge
infrastructures
Blog/Website
Social Channels
Social Media
Picture
Engagement
ICT infrastructures
Palaver tree
Buildings
Development centers
Physical knowledge platform
|
Analyze the access capacity on knowledge
of the client
|
Basis resources
Delivery strategies
Socio cultural infrastructures
Right knowledge package
Right knowledge package´s formats
Right infrastructures that support this
knowledge
Procurement
|
Evaluate the format on knowledge of the
client
|
Virtual portal
Media
photos
Video
Book
Voice
Theatre
Discussion
Local knowledge resources format
Communities’ activities
|
Do nothing, do something, and do minimum
|
Start small
Asses
Keep it clear
Keep it easy
Collaborate with local communities
Avoid complex theory management style
Experiment the knowledge business case
Listen to communities
Focus on communities interests
|
Follow and manage change
|
Question
Query
Idea
Observation
Concern
|
Keep supporting
|
Adaptation
Right resources
Right format
Amelioration
Measurement
Evaluation
Assessment
Attention of potential
Attention of new requirement
|
Keep updating
|
Designing new knowledge business case
Innovation
Designing new knowledge format
Designing new knowledge infrastructure
Designing new knowledge business case
Stay actual
Eager of progress
Building knowledge network
Share resources
Highlight events
Training updates
Blog posts
Ask and answer questions.
|
Technique
|
Knowledge-based planning technique
Focus on social attention
Establishing clearly the knowledge
package business case
Determining the knowledge scope boundary
for the Plan
Preparing the foundations for Work
knowledge package
Articulating responsibilities for
creating, reviewing, and approving the knowledge package business case
|
Content
|
Community’s expectations
Standards and processes
Prioritized
Relevant content
Gaining a better understanding
Knowledge of local knowledge management
practices
Acceptance Criteria
Learned
|
Local Skills
|
Handle the knowledge package
Sharing and transfer
Enhance
Exploit
Scope
|
Face to face
|
Development center meetings
Palaver tree
Team
Decisions
Discussions and problem solving place
Harvest celebrations
Festivals place
Stories place
Consensus place
Review place
|
Language
|
Knowledge package for development
language´s scope
Local language
Community’s language
Official language
Dialects…
|
Format
|
Virtual portal
digital
Oral
Physical
Medias
|
Technical Infrastructures
|
ICT Infrastructures
Web applications
Telecentre
e-learning
Television
Radio
Mobile
Databases
Collaborative software
Virtual platform
Online conference and communication
Social media Platform
|
Non-technical Infrastructures
|
Palaver Trees
Story place
Group discussions
Collective communication place
Development centers
Traditional knowledge sharing centers
Problem solving place
Festivals place
Group consensus place
Final decision place
|
Mapping the practical knowledge package core Business processes
Mapping the knowledge package core Business processes
|
Data
Processes
Information
Knowledge
Wisdom
Perception
Reason
Emotion
|
Establishing Roles, Responsibilities
|
Knowledge institution
Knowledge organization
Knowledge package board
Knowledge package producer
Knowledge package customizer
Knowledge package connector
Knowledge package support
|
Establishing the critical Success factors
|
Knowledge scope
Knowledge infrastructures
Knowledge format
Knowledge resources
Knowledge potential
Knowledge cultures
Knowledge environment
Knowledge update concept
|
Choose the basis
|
Decision
Process
Output
Outcome
Benefit
|
Setting the KPI
|
input
environment
Business case
Process
Output
Outcome
Benefit
Availability/resources
Communities
|
Setting the knowledge package target
|
Performance levels
Focus
Alignment
Goals
Achievement
Implementation
Assumption
Motivation
|
Review the knowledge package through
|
The Reviewer
Producer
Consumer
Support group
Stakeholder
|
Knowledge delivery
|
Define and accept the knowledge package for development format
Define and accept the knowledge package for development
infrastructures
Execute the knowledge package for development
Deliver the knowledge package for development
Agreed updating and supporting frequency for the knowledge
package development
|
Motivation
|
Performance
Management
Formulation
Coherence
Strategy and objective
Efficiency
Effectiveness
|
Controlling
|
Doing the right thing
Control
Measurement
Assessment
|
Good issue management procedure
|
Capture
Examine
Propose
Decide
Implement
|
Budgeting
|
Purchasing better socio cultural knowledge infrastructures
Purchasing better knowledge format
Better understand the situation.
Cost-effective
|
Common goals
|
Focus on people’s thinking and work
Common vision of accomplishment
Creativity in developing better ways to achieve the knowledge package
goal
Quick feedback
Output, focuses on improving
Outcome, focuses on motivation
|
Celebration
|
Celebration to improvement
Leading the celebration
Motivation
Learning-sharing
|
Promotion
|
Competence
Value of development
Promotion
Target communities convinced
|
Learning
|
Right sharing and learning processes,
Right information format
Right collaboration and participation
|
Improvement
|
Development performance
Improvements.
Output
Outcome
Benefit
|
Evaluating
|
Status Update
Main knowledge sharing and transfer issues
Major knowledge sharing and transfer in the past period
Major knowledge sharing and transfer expected in the next period
Quality assurance
|
Conclusion
This paper helps me to
responding to the problem that at the end of the day, we can say we provided
practical knowledge, we achieved results, however no one is happy and the
solution becomes unsustainable.
Adopting this framework will guarantee that any delivered intervention has it merit into the community practices. So at the end of the day, we can say we provided and delivered successfully practical knowledge, we achieved results, and everyone is happy and the solution becomes sustainable.. I really hope that community development will think about adapting this approach in their intervention delivery agenda to achieve great development results.
A paper that describes what it takes to put together a workable delivered intervention - One of the complex missions of the science of the delivery.
*Author, Amouzou Bedi (Expertise and knowledge of the science management and its cultural implications in the developed and developing world in particular), contact on LinkedIn. I will try to update this paper on a regular basis if a need arises. Please if you have a suggestion - how we can better this approach and feedback with regards to this work please feel free to share this. Many thanks for taking your time to read this paper. Thank you Mr. Bruce Summers, CVA, and all.
Photo: Design for Delivery and Focus
Photo- Angoisse: http://www.crises-angoisses.com/
Photo- Angoisse: http://www.crises-angoisses.com/